|

welcome! to emotional feelings, 4!
after looking things over here at emotional feelings, 4,
try out "the layer down under," (part of the emotional feelings
network of sites) & read a special "i just gotta say it" column concerning porn addiction by clicking here! Be sure to scroll down towards the bottom of the right hand column to find it!
just
another great suggestion... visit the homepage! you can read more about the emotional feelings network of sites there, as well
as, a heads up about who is feeling what emotions within the network each month!
How this site works best for you!
You'll
notice that there are many underlined link words in each article below. The reason for this is that you have reached not only, "emotional
feelings, 4," but the emotional feelings network of sites. There are many sites included
within the network that'll be visited by clicking on these underlined link words.
If you can't find what you came
here looking for, visit the homepage for the emotional feelings network of sites by clicking above & read the options on
the homepage for the networks index of sites. Try to be specific when looking for an emotion or feeling word & click on the site you need!
It's very simple & very
interesting to follow your way thru the layers of your buried or stuffed emotions & feelings that have accumulated throughout the years!
when you've reached this point, or this website, you know you're making
progress!!!! this part gets difficult because now is the time to look within & become emotionally honest with yourself!!!
Best of luck & if you're
still stuck, send me an e-mail anytime, by clicking here & I'll be glad to send you an immediate personal response!
Sincerely,
Kathleen



Social-emotional dependency
If we're willing to seriously hurt someone to please an authority we'll know for only an hour, one has to wonder how strong our dependency is on parents, friends & loved ones.
Harry Harlow (Harlow &
Harlow, 1966) did an impressive series of studies
demonstrating that baby monkeys need mothering. Unless the monkeys received some kind of love in the form of being held, stroked & played with, they developed abnormally, i.e., they became scared, hostile, self-destructive & sexually inept.
Human infants also need loving care; they may die without it. Bowlby (1969) found the infant's first attachment was to mother & then to others. These early needs & emotional bonds are powerful & possibly innate. Can it be that
this same kind of desperate clinging dependency persists as adults?
Takeo Doi (1973), a Japanese psychoanalyst, describes
a unique Japanese
word - amae -
which refers to the longing of an infant at the breast to have every whim attended to, to be enveloped in indulgent love, to feel at one w/the mother.
Doi says such a
feeling continues into adulthood. It's being so dependent & needy that one is very careful not to disrupt such a warm, giving relationship; thus, the Japanese are dutifully apologetic.
It means being so
close to another person that one can be self-indulgent without embarrassment. It means seeking unconditional love, love you receive just by existing (what Fromm called "Mother's love").
The Japanese are more aware of these dependency needs, partly because they have the word (amae) & partly
because their culture doesn't emphasize (as
much as ours does) individual freedom & self-reliance.
They're willing to stay close & subservient to their parents; they're inclined to
become attached to the company they work for, giving conscientious work & expecting life-long support from the company.
In the last chapter, we discussed the conflicts between teenagers & their parents. Both anger & dependency are involved. Later in this chapter we'll consider the lingering dependency ties with parents even after we "grow up."
Our need to be accepted
Otto Rank (1932), an early student of Freud, said it was important to assert one's own "will." He believed that most neuroses develop because people don't have the courage to be themselves; instead, they suppress their true selves in order to please others.
Many others agree. Moustakas (1967) calls conformity a self-alienating process by which he means that we cut ourselves
off from our own feelings, dreams, talents & potential because we want to be liked.
Other peoples' fears of being "different" cause them to reject us if we are "different" & unique. Thus, it's our fear of being rejected (by conformists), that causes us to lose our own freedom & independence.
Fritz Perls wrote a popular poster which reflects our common struggle to get free of domination by others:
"I do my thing & you do your thing. I'm
not in this world to live up to your expectations & you're not in this world to live up to mine. You are you & I am I & if by chance we find each other, it's beautiful.
If not, it can't be helped."



How Dependent Are We? What Makes Us So Dependent
Love & dependency
Songs, poems & novels attest to our desperate yearning for
love. Psychologists talk about it too (Fromm, 1974; Maslow, 1970; Shostrom, 1972; Peele, 1976).
Mature love, according to Fromm, doesn't say, "I love you because I need you," but rather "I need you because I love you."
Romantic love is referred to as D-love by Maslow. D-love is based on one's deficiencies, on one's weakness, as in popular
songs: "I'd be lost without you" or "Since you left me baby, my life is over."
We need someone else to make us feel adequate or whole & secure. B-love is mature, unselfish love, i.e. based on a love of the "being" of the other person.
The self-actualized person wants but doesn't desperately need love so the loss of love to them is regretted but not traumatic. If our loved one decides to leave us, it probably means they're
growing &/or trying something new.
We could wish them well instead of being crushed. We're crushed because we feel so needy. Maslow's theory suggests our reaction to the loss of love depends on how we look at it & our self-esteem.
D-love is like an addiction to drugs: we get hooked on someone we can't
do without because of our own inadequacies (Peele, 1976).
How common is this? Some form of "social dependency" (a lover or friends)
is the addiction of 2/3 of middle class teenagers; lower classes use drugs & alcohol, according to Peele. More mature love--B-love--is the opposite of interpersonal addiction. As a weak, needy person in deficiency-based love we're absorbed by this one relationship; it's our whole life.

After the infatuation is over, how can you tell if it's mature love or addictive dependency? Ask yourself these questions (Peele, 1976):
- Is each lover mature & confident of his/her own worth & ability? Are they independent? Are they each comfortable alone?
- Are both continuously improved by the relationship?
- Do both have outside interests & relationships?
- Is the love relationship integrated into his & her life rather than being an isolated part of life?
- Is there no jealousy of the lover's success,
growth & new interests?
- Are the lovers also genuine, honest, close friends?
When our obsession with another person causes us to neglect our own needs & priorities, to neglect our own life, you need to cure your love addiction. Bireda (1990) addresses this problem directly.
Germaine Greer (1971) in The Female Eunuch points out that some lovers like their partners to fail or to have a weakness because a scared, inadequate person is more likely to stay dependent on them.
Likewise, making yourself indispensable to your partner, i.e. making him or her dependent on
you, may be harmful to the relationship in the long run.
She says the question to ask is: "Do I want my love to be happy more than I want him/her to be with me?" If your answer is yes, it's probably mature love. If it's no or "I'm not sure," watch out for clinging dependency.
If your life centers almost entirely around your loved one, naturally breaking up will be agonizing & take a long time. Of course, growing & mature people often go different directions; parting will be regretted & painful for them too, but not a long-lasting emotional disaster.
In those cases where love suddenly turns to hate, it suggests that the person was thinking more of him/herself than the lover all along. One of the fantastic experiences of life is being deeply in love -obsessed with someone, thrilled by them, wanting to touch them all the time. Maybe the desperate need for love can't be escaped.

There's a saying,
"Love is nature's trick to insure the species."
The deep internal feelings of love are so similar all over the world, it isn't likely we learn to love from the movies.
Of course, we're often hoping for more from
love than a relationship & sex. So often we hope that love & marriage will solve many or all of our anxieties & problems (Gordon, 1976).
As we'll discuss later, traditional women have wanted economic, social & emotional satisfaction; traditional men have wanted
all the comforts of home, admiration & emotional support.
(Non-traditional men & women expect less from their spouse.)
When our expectations aren't met by our lover, we have problems (disappointment & anger).
Being familiar with these theories - & that's all they are - may make us more aware of the emotional dependency & unreasonableness involved in "blind" love.
This awareness can help us cope. If deep, intimate love can't exist without certain kinds of dependencies, maybe we can anticipate those needs & handle them. Judith Bardwick (1979) & Marion Solomon (1994) say that
lovers are always dependent.
To them dependency merely means mature lovers need affection & affirmation as being good, capable people. Lovers don't need to be insecure, self-doubting & helpless. But dependency is a part of intimacy.
They say mature lovers need both closeness & also distance; they need emotional connections & also autonomy.
This is called an interdependent relationship.
Without a long-term commitment to a love relationship, Bardwick says we're in danger
of feeling insecure, finding little meaning in life, & longing for unconditional love (Mother's love or amae).
I think love may be a basic human need, like safety or being
touched or sex. I think there's some inevitable pain when love is lost (at least, it seems true for most of us). Thus, people in love aren't independent in the sense that they can just easily walk away (angry lovers perhaps can).
Healthy people in love are independent enough that they can, with conscious effort, walk away from a very unhappy, restrictive relationship.
Having formed
a couple, each person should, of course, remain free to have his/her own interests, friends & activities. So, lovers need to be independent & dependent.
A student shared with me this beautiful, poignant message:
Being Your Own Person
After a while you
learn the subtle difference
between holding a
hand and chaining a soul,
And you learn that
love doesn't mean leaning
and company doesn't
mean security,
And you begin to
learn that kisses aren't contracts
<
|